How Sales Managers Can Effectively Manage These 4 Different Personality Types In A Team

Even though you’re a new manager, you’re already very aware of the need to motivate people and make sure they’re doing their jobs. And naturally, you feel frustrated when your people don’t always do as you need them to. But consider this: perhaps your people are also frustrated that you’re not doing what they need you to.
Diversity Builds Great Teams
“High performance teams are needed for project and product design, and engineering activities, and those that advocate diversity and inclusive behaviours help to scale digital initiatives” says the VP of Gartner’s Advisory service, Bruce Robertson.
However, Robertson isn’t particularly referring to gender diversity or ethnic diversity here, but rather what he calls cognitive diversity; categorised as ‘mixing people together with different thinking styles, habits, and perspectives’. Therefore, there is a growing trend to have many different personality types in a team. But while valuable for performance, team diversity can create headaches for the people that lead them. It’s important to question whether you’re giving each individual the approach they need so you can be confident of building a good team culture overall.
Understanding Personalities
In your previous role, you probably enjoyed being able to do things in your own way. As a manager, however, you’re beginning to see that different people work in different ways. At first, you may have taken quite a directive management style for leading your team, and maybe tried to convince each member of the team to conform to your style. As you’re gaining more experience and developing your management skills, however, you’re starting to notice that people respond differently to different situations; that there are many different personality types in a team. So how can you manage each personality type well?
The secret is to understand the various different personality types in a team. According to a report by LinkedIn, there are four classic personality types that are found in any team:
1. The Analytical Type
The analytical personality type is driven by logic. These individuals value tangible facts and figures that make sense, and are cautious about moving forward without data. Behaviours and actions are deeply governed by organisational rules and regulations.
Management tip: Regular one-to-one meetings are highly effective for the analytical personality type, as this environment allows you to set clear expectations with the individual.
2. The Natural Leader
Those with inherent leadership characteristics tend to be willing to take risks in order to be pioneers. They have a desire to make a difference, and to influence those around them. Risk-taking actions mean they have a great deal of experience in many areas.
Management tip: Listen and learn. Offer opportunities for the natural leader to present ideas and facilitate innovation within the team, motivating others to do the same.
3. The Enthusiast
The enthusiast feels most comfortable when they’re driving their hard work and efforts into areas they’re passionate about. They have a strong vision of what they want from the role, and may feel discouraged when working on tasks that don’t align with this.
Management tip: Be flexible. Encourage the enthusiast to use their own creative techniques for undertaking their tasks. Have tools to hand to keep them on track.
4. The Easy Going Type
The easy going personality type is generally quite amiable and simply needs to feel as though they are part of a strong team. They value the two-way-street concept, caring about the team and the company as a whole as long as they feel they are valued.
Management tip: Try to take a nurturing approach with the easy going type. Schedule regular meetings to ‘check in’, and offer plenty of opportunities for active discussion.
Effectively Managing Your Diverse Team
While it is clear that good leaders need to be chameleons to manage the many different personality types in a team, it’s important not to treat every person differently all the time. In fact, all personalities typically respond well to two blanket approaches:
- Team Identification
Regardless of personality type, all members of the team need to feel as though they are all part of the same group, working towards the same common goal. When multiple different personality types are in a single team, it can sometimes feel as though they’re working against each other, rather than supporting each other. This can make team members feel negatively about diversity and result in a need for you to put your conflict management training into practise. Instead, individuals need to know that they’re part of a ‘family’, making them more open to collaboration, rather than dominance.
- Self Awareness
As a leader, one of your responsibilities is to ensure that each of your team members understands where they fit into the equation. By taking measures - such as workplace assessments - to encourage self awareness amongst your team, you’re helping each individual to not only understand their own personality type, but the personality type of those around them. Recognising difference can be instrumental in minimising conflict, and lays the groundwork for improved communications between all team members.
Learn as you go
You care about your team, and you naturally want what’s best for them. But it’s important to remember that you may not get your approach spot on the very first time. This can be frustrating, especially if you’re a perfectionist, but a big part of being a good leader is learning through doing. Trust your team, carry out a skills gap analysis, give them a degree of autonomy in appropriate areas, and observe their behaviours… understanding them and what makes them tick is key to giving them what they need from you.

We offer a scalable employee training solution. It lets you continuously upskill your people.
Book a callRelated articles

Review by:
Why ChatGPT-5 enables human intelligence and performance
AI advances like ChatGPT-5 are transforming the workforce, but not without risks. With entry-level roles disappearing and human cognition declining through overreliance on AI, leaders must prioritize skill resilience and talent pipelines to sustain long-term performance.

Review by:
Jeroen Kraaijenbrink: How organizations can overcome the honesty gap
Senior leadership and boardroom teams invest heavily in commercial strategies to win market shares. Yet the most important and honest information driving strategy circulates in teams underneath, never making it to the table where decisions are made.Jeroen Kraaijenbrink, Executive Coach and Strategy Consultant at Kraaijenbrink Advisory, has spent years working on what he calls the honesty gap. We sat down with him to understand what the honesty gap actually is, where it lives in organizations, and why fixing it requires a leadership shift.How do you define the honesty gap?There's a narrow definition and a broad one. The broad one is: we have created organizations and systems where it's barely possible to be honest to yourself, about yourself, and honest to other people.Honesty isn't just lying. It's integrity, being authentically connected to other people and being aware of your own emotions and your own biases.The honesty gap, in a narrow sense, is the fact that truth and information don’t travel vertically upwards in a company. It's often hard to speak openly to your manager because it’s become rational not to. Many people have the experience: 'I've tried it once but then I was punished for it, or was ignored, so let it be, never mind.' That's the fascinating part: it's not good for people, it's not good for organizations and yet we somehow keep this system intact.Is it less about individual dishonesty and more about a collective culture?A lot of the most important information going through your company is between people and in conversations. You need to find a way to have an honest conversation, where the things that matter get on the meeting table, not just in the informal circuit. And I think that's pretty rare.A more systematic definition is that we're not using the collective intelligence of a company enough. We can radically improve it because we’ve made it rational to hide the truth and to keep things to yourself. A lot of it may not be intentional, but the very fact that someone is in a position above you automatically creates this tension: 'What do I show? What don't I show? Because my next performance appraisal is coming up.'Where does the honesty gap typically show up first, and who owns the problem?It starts with leaders. Solving it needs one leader at the top, the CEO at least, being open and reflective enough to admit that there is an honesty gap and that they are part of it. That's the self-reflection you need for any improvement and any change. Like in coaching: you need to be aware that there is stuff to improve. You don't need to be a perfect leader, but you need to be open enough to admit that there is an issue.You talk about the 'persona trap', what is that?You're stuck in a persona where you perform in a certain way within your company. You have a role, a position, a reputation, and that locks you into specific behaviors. The worse the match between who you are as a person and how you need to show up in your organization, the more inner conflict that’s created. Especially at the top, it’s a problem for many executives. They're supposed to be the people who know it all and be decisive. While if you're honest, you don't necessarily know everything, you’re uncertain and have anxieties.The inner core of the honesty gap is breaking the performance, breaking the acting you feel you must do. If you've put yourself in a role of being the strong, decisive, number-oriented leader, that's how you have to behave. But most people don't feel very comfortable in that kind of role because it's not who they are.Can you fix the honesty gap through individual coaching alone or does the system have to change?Part of it is a personal change, part of it is a system change. You can be on your own and be very authentic, but if the system doesn't change at all, you’ll struggle to break the honesty gap.What you need to do is work on the people, the culture, and the system. Ideally that has to include the top, because otherwise it stays at the level of the person being coached. If it's a team lead or a mid-manager, that person can partly create an island in the organization, a safe space for their team and their department. But still, the appraisal systems, objectives, and culture are company-wide. Why is this so hard to shift, even when leaders recognize the problem?We have normalized this idea that you have to be strategic in what you tell and what you show. You have to show up in a certain role at work. It's also the result of how we have separated work from life, which is a very unnatural thing. It's from the industrial age, because for any other species, work is life. But now there’s a split between work, with all the routines in companies, and then your private life. There's just one you, you're the same person at home as you are at work. The good news is that the honesty gap can be closed. While many companies have unintentionally created environments where people hesitate to speak openly, organizations prioritizing trust, authenticity, and psychological safety can unlock a competitive advantage. When employees feel safe to share concerns, ideas, and perspectives, collective intelligence grows, decision-making improves, and stronger relationships emerge across every level of the business.
Ready to drive impact together?
Close skill gaps, accelerate growth, and future-proof your workforce.




.webp)

